Frank. defined


For those of you who are well versed in the original Franks you will probably think that Jorge or myself  put these definitions in the urban dictionary. I promise we did not, you cannot write this stuff, well evidently somebody did.

1) A name for a old man who thinks he is still attractive to young women, usually wears speedos at the beach.
Young woman: “You need help with your bags sir?”
Old man: “No but I need help getting my cock up your ass”
Young woman: ” Get away from me Frank!”

2)  The ability to consume immense amounts of alcohol in short periods of time, and still being able to remain upright under one’s own power after doing such.
example “Man, she really franked that bottle of vodka! I’m surprised she’s still standing!!!

3) a male who is extremely charming in manner because of their gentleman behavior, also has good looks and thinks that women are better then men, has high pain tolerance and like it kinky.
example  ”oh my good frank is here i love frank he is such a sweet guy.”

5) very good looking guy. He is Nice, Funny, Smart and the girls love him. Always honest and very fun to be around. Strong, The typical tall dark and handsome, and loves everything about girls.
example: Ashley: Wow look at him he is so nice and really hot.

6)  person that likes to have a good time,even if it is at the expense of someone else. Usually picks up the tab for his closest friends, Sometimes is considered the life of the party; during down-time this person will rest up for the next good time and think up ways to harass his friends (a very kind hearted person with an evil side)
Hey that person was so funny and cool he should have been named Frank

7) A salesperson who bends you over and fucks you in the ass. Then steals your money.
Listen, if you really aren’t interested, I can hand you over to Frank who can give you further assistance with the sale.


Fixing frank, A movie review


fixingfrank2

“Fixing Frank” is an engrossing movie that tackles the subject of conversion therapy. When the movie starts, Frank is in a session with Dr. Apsey, saying things that clearly show him to be a self-hating homosexual. We quickly learn that Frank doesn’t really hate himself, but is working with his therapist boyfriend Jonathan on an article to discredit Apsey’s practice of helping homosexuals become happy heterosexuals” Fixing Frank” addresses the classic gay question: if there were a pill to make you straight, would you take it? So… would you?

Jeff Walsh Oasis magazine

In other words, if there were a pill you could take to become a non-Frank, would you take it? I think all true Franks, self loathers such as myself, would probably not take that pill because if we cannot be Frank then who would we be? -Willie



ernie hits the rio


So there I was, wondering how I had a costume but no sleeping bag

ernie-rafts2




1979 COLT NED BUNTLINE .45 SAA XXX

——————————————————————————–

Colt Ned Buntline .45LC. 12″ barrel, nickel finish WITH black grips. The gun comes with walnut presentation case and nickel finished ammunition. Gun is unfired, new in box. XXX SET

——————————————————————————–

.

bunts



Ned Buntline


Ned Buntline (March 20, c. 1821 – July 16, 1886), was a pseudonym of Edward Zane Carroll Judson (E. Z. C. Judson), an American publisher, journalist writer and publicist best known for his dime novels and the Colt Buntline Special he commissioned from Colt’s Manufacturing Company.

Edward Judson was born in Stamford, Delaware County, New York. As a boy, Ned ran away to sea.Buntline” is a nautical term for a rope at the bottom of a square sail. As a seaman, he fought in the Seminole Wars, though he saw little combat. After four years he resigned, having reached the rank of midshipman. Buntline spent several years in the east starting up newspapers and story papers, only to have most of them fail. An early success that helped launch his fame was a gritty serial story of the Bowery and slums of New York City titled The Mysteries and Miseries of New York. An opinionated man, he strongly advocated nativism and temperance. Through his writing and his association with New York City’s notorious gangs of the early 1800s, he was one of the instigators of the Astor Place Riot which left 23 people dead. He also had an involvement in a nativist riot in St. Louis - an involvement that would later come back to haunt him. Although a heavy drinker, he traveled around the country giving lectures about temperance. It was on one of these lecture tours that he encountered Buffalo Bill.



how much is in a bushel?


Exactly how much is a bushel?

You hear this term for measurement all of the time, particularly in agriculture reports, but exactly how much is a bushel?

In the United States, a bushel is a unit of volume used for the dry measurement of things such as vegetables, fruits or grains and is equivalent to 4 pecks. In the U.S. Customary System, a bushel is equal to 2,150.42 cubic inches, or 35.24 liter.

When used as a British capacity of measure, or in the British Imperial System, a bushel is used as both a dry and liquid measure and equals 2219.36 cubic inches or 36.37 liters.

To better visualize the capacity of a bushel, one can use the following list to get a better idea regarding the actual size of a bushel:

42-48 pounds of apples
60 pounds of potatoes
45 pounds of tomatoes
42 pounds of white flour
56 pounds of shelled corn
50 pounds of rutabagas
48 pounds of barley
32 pounds of oats
42 pounds of turnips

The average person may never actually measure anything in terms of a bushel, but having a basic understanding of this form of measurement may certainly help city folk during that next visit to the orchard or farm



lines of bunt


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/cody/program/

Watch chapter three of the buffalo bill PBS special. Mr. “Buntline” is a real character



I just saw myself on TV…


Hind sight is 20/20 - Check out this link



More as opposed to less stimulus


Barack Obama has been president for almost a month and the change relative to the last eight years is strikingly evident. Policies and ideas never considered are already enacted and taking form. However, this triumphant shift has the meager Republican Party frightened of being completely steam rolled. On Tuesday, the $789 billion dollar stimulus package passed with zero Republican votes in the House and three in the Senate. The bill gives significant funds to renewable energy and energy efficiency programs, school construction, science and technological research and other government services like unemployment insurance. The final bill was watered down due to Republican dissent, which created a weaker bill with more tax cuts and cutting $80 billion in overall spending.

On the other hand, large sums of money are going to areas of the economy that are in dire need, some of which, like renewable energy have never received a fraction of the attention they are now. So even though the bill was severely tarnished, relative to the last eight years there is a lot to look forward to.

The overall idea of the package is absolutely prudent considering the state of the economy, albeit, much of the spending is just resetting funding levels slashed by the previous administration. In the last eight years unemployment insurance, healthcare, and state and local governments funding has experienced huge cuts all helping to deep the recession. Specifically, $40 billion to extend unemployment benefits, $48 billion on transportation projects, $24 billion for unemployed health insurance (COBRA) and $50 billion for energy programs, focused chiefly on efficiency and renewable energy. The bill does take notable steps in the right direction in terms of funding for science and research, and renewable energy however; significant cuts were made in the most effective spending measures.

A total of about $80 billion was cut from the bill in the end with the most drastic cuts coming from state aid, which cut $40 billion and school construction, which lost $16 billion. Both of which can create jobs immediately as well as sustain them in the longer term. Other key cuts include $600 million cut in No Child Left Behind, and halving of the funds for federal building energy efficiency down to $3.5 billion.

Critical cuts came in the most effective programs, things that can be distributed and used quickly like money to state governments. What is worse, approximately $70 billion dollars worth of tax cuts were added to the bill which will be ineffective at creating jobs or any other stimulus. Food stamps were thinned down, as well as unemployment benefits; both services that can be distributed quickly and heavily impact families’ ability to remain solvent. Last week, almost 4.8 million people collected unemployment insurance, the highest weekly number in 40 years.   The bill includes $282 billion in tax relief, mainly for the wealthy, which will probably not be spent, and $507 billion in spending.

The right side has relied on a faith based ideological economic theory as the means to oppose government spending and promote tax cuts. The clichés and rhetoric chanting for less government interference are laughable, especially at a time like this. As President Obama has repeatedly noted, the theories and policies of the past eight years have been directly responsible for the current state of the economy. Less government has lead to less everything. Lower median income levels in 2007 than in 2000, home prices dropped 16 percent in a year, 46 million people under the age of 65 do not have health insurance, 3.5 million fewer people have jobs today than in the beginning of 2008. The government has done less and we now have less, of everything. In tandem with less government regulation is the supposed worry by Republicans about the deficit and over spending, however spending billions on the Iraq War seemed to be okay for the deficit worriers. The arguments against spending and for tax cuts are absolutely incoherent and intolerable considering the magnitude of this crisis. Tax cuts do essentially nothing to stimulate the economy and get people working in the short term, because a lot of that money would be saved by the wealthy whereas direct government spending is spent right away creating jobs as well as a useful resource, such as schools and bridges.

Some have become worried that this has struck at the momentum of the Obama administration and will chip away at its effectiveness to lead. Indeed, significant cuts in key spending areas were made and the allusions of bipartisanship disappeared in the wake of the political process, but the strength of the Obama administration has the right clinging to whatever they can. As a result, the American economy is being short changed by a weak and slow package. The economy is in its worst shape in decades and is going to get worse for longer than people realize.  The only tool left is government spending that matches the magnitude of the problem, which is huge.

Overall, the stimulus plan falls short in size, timeliness, and targeting. However, the loss of recognition for the massive shift our country is making relative to where we were heading until a month ago would undermine the progress we have made. Big important changes are leading the country in a new direction. Proactive ideas about health care, America’s role internationally and the way we produce and consume energy were dreams in recent years, and now they are actually happening. While it is easy to become furious with Republicans erratic and baseless arguments, the fight for a working government that provides social safety nets and desired public goods has been long coming and it must not be taken for granted. The opportunity to finally fix these much-neglected sectors of our economy is inspiring, and yes hopeful.

Home



levels


p10106191

 

Home